the funniest law review article I've ever read
I know it seems weird to describe a law review article as mildly entertaining, let alone funny, but this article will not disappoint. It’s the funniest thing I’ve read in a while.
If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, the party may move for a more definite statement before interposing a responsive pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e).
I know it seems weird to describe a law review article as mildly entertaining, let alone funny, but this article will not disappoint. It’s the funniest thing I’ve read in a while.
4 Comments:
yep, this is the big difference between a good student and, uh, me. i read humorous reality tv recaps and blog entries, you read law review articles. um, i think i'll go study now or something like that (hangs head in shame).
Further proof that Eugene Volokh can get ANYTHING published in the Yale Law Journal. Sigh...Yale Law Journal....
If you're looking for entertaining Westlaw results, search for "in forma pauperis" AND "Dick Cheney" (or "Satan," or any other prominent figure or recent cabinet member) in the ALLFEDS database.
Yiddish may be edging out Latin in legalese, but it hasn't made much headway in the Vatican yet.
that volokh sure has a lot of khutzpah to write something like this
Post a Comment
<< Home